Module

Reasoning Validate

Check whether conclusions logically follow from cited evidence.

Quick reference

Core invocation details and the exact command surfaces users will touch first.

Type
Module
Slash command
/reasoning-validate
CLI
bohr reasoning-validate

At a glance

The shortest useful summary of what this workflow is for and what it produces.

  • Checks whether conclusions follow logically from premises and citations.
  • Use for memos and summaries where logical leaps are costly.
  • Returns an issue list with suggested repairs.

How to run

Start with the slash command in the REPL for interactive work, or call the CLI when you need a shell-native invocation.

In the Bohr research shell (REPL), enter /reasoning-validate followed by your topic or instructions. From a terminal, invoke the CLI as bohr reasoning-validate. Refer to the linked documentation for arguments, profiles, and environment setup.

Flow diagram

Stages and agent labels are indicative. Your configuration may swap or rename modules, but the diagram still shows the intended execution shape and handoff order.

Detailed guide

Full notes, usage guidance, and the longer explanation for how this workflow behaves in practice.

Overview

Stress-tests argumentative glue—where leaps happen even if citations exist.

When to use it

Policy memos, reviews, or executive summaries with tight logic needs.

Outputs

Issue list with suggested repairs.

Practical notes

Exact agents, tools, and stop rules depend on your Bohr configuration. For CLI flags, examples, and edge cases, open the full documentation from the Documentation & links section on this page.

See also