Module

Contradiction

Adversarial pass on conclusions and cited support.

Quick reference

Core invocation details and the exact command surfaces users will touch first.

Type
Module
Slash command
/contradict
CLI
bohr contradict

At a glance

The shortest useful summary of what this workflow is for and what it produces.

  • Stress-tests whether conclusions hold up against the cited evidence.
  • Pairs well with reasoning validation for argumentative rigor.
  • Surfaces contradictions with severity hints for triage.

How to run

Start with the slash command in the REPL for interactive work, or call the CLI when you need a shell-native invocation.

In the Bohr research shell (REPL), enter /contradict followed by your topic or instructions. From a terminal, invoke the CLI as bohr contradict. Refer to the linked documentation for arguments, profiles, and environment setup.

Flow diagram

Stages and agent labels are indicative. Your configuration may swap or rename modules, but the diagram still shows the intended execution shape and handoff order.

Detailed guide

Full notes, usage guidance, and the longer explanation for how this workflow behaves in practice.

Overview

Surfaces conflicts between narrative and evidence—pair with reasoning validation for rigor.

When to use it

Before finalizing conclusions or when a draft feels too tidy.

Outputs

Contradiction map with severity hints.

Practical notes

Exact agents, tools, and stop rules depend on your Bohr configuration. For CLI flags, examples, and edge cases, open the full documentation from the Documentation & links section on this page.

See also